Can AI Simulate Cinematic Camera Movement?
Camera movement can transform a simple shot into something emotional and immersive. It’s the difference between a scene that feels observed and one that feels experienced. But it’s also one of the hardest things for AI to master. Smooth motion, consistent depth, and natural parallax are easy for the human eye to recognize, but difficult for a machine to recreate.
As with every test in this series, we grounded our approach in real-world creative use cases—branded storytelling, product demos, and narrative content—to understand how today’s AI tools perform in the kinds of projects creative teams actually make. We also wrote our prompts the way a director or videographer would: specifying lens choices, framing, and camera behavior.
The Setup
All three shots were generated using the same creative conditions: hyperrealism, cinematic lighting, and consistent lens cues.
Each test explored a different cinematic camera movement that challenges AI’s grasp of space and physics:
- Orbit / 360° Shot — tests spatial consistency and parallax
- Tracking Shot — tests smooth, stable subject motion
- Crane / Drone Pullback — tests scale, depth, and environmental realism
We used five leading AI video generators: Veo 3, Kling, Runway, Sora, and Higgsfield.
Notably, Sora doesn’t currently support image-to-video, which limits continuity across tests—especially when evaluating how it interprets detailed prompts based on a consistent visual reference.
Our goal was to discern how each tool handled fluidity, depth, and cinematic realism when movement itself became part of the storytelling.
Test 1: Orbit / 360° Shot
Reference Image:
Video Compilation:
Prompt Summary:
A young skateboarder cruises down a quiet suburban street under a pink-and-orange sunset. The camera attempts to orbit smoothly around them, maintaining a waist-level framing as the world rotates in the background.
This shot tested depth, parallax, and spatial reconstruction—cinematographer-level skills that rely on precise camera motion and lighting continuity.
Quick Observations:
- Veo 3 delivered the most realistic shot overall, though the orbit was partial.
- Kling generated the best rounded view—accurate scenery, lighting, and natural fill—but still fell short of a full 360°.
- Higgsfield was the only model to achieve a complete rotation, though the movement looked awkward on a moving subject.
- Runway and Sora ignored the orbit direction altogether, defaulting to static, front-facing shots.
Creative Note: True 360° camera motion requires an understanding of 3D spatial geometry and subject continuity—something only a trained cinematographer would instinctively describe in a prompt.
Test 2: Tracking Shot
Reference Image:
Video Compilation:
Prompt Summary:
A young woman runs through a narrow, rain-slick alley glowing with neon light. The camera tracks from behind and slightly to the left, gliding at waist height with Steadicam precision.
This test examined motion stability, pacing, and camera fluidity—how well AI could maintain consistent tracking and dynamic lighting across complex reflections.
Quick Observations:
- Veo 3 produced the smoothest, most cinematic motion.
- Kling delivered similarly smooth tracking, but leaned harder into speed and intensity—more action sequence than cinematic glide.
- Higgsfield surprised with two strong, useable angles that captured facial expression and emotion.
- Runway tracked well but felt undercranked—subject motion looked choppy and slow.
- Sora rendered a game-like look with inconsistent realism.
Creative Note: The most realistic results came from prompts written like a gimbal operator’s shot plan—detailing tracking height, stabilization, and pacing. That level of precision made the difference between mechanical and cinematic motion.
Test 3: Crane / Drone Pullback
Reference Image:
Video Compilation:
Prompt Summary:
A lone hiker stands on a cliff at golden hour. The camera begins close behind their shoulder, then lifts and pulls back in one continuous glide, revealing the full scale of the landscape as the sun drops over the horizon.
This sequence tested depth scaling, environmental reconstruction, and exposure transitions—elements that make or break cinematic storytelling.
Quick Observations:
- Veo 3 was again the smoothest and most balanced pullback, with graceful motion and natural light shifts.
- Kling executed a strong shot but moved too quickly, breaking realism.
- Runway ignored the pullback direction, instead creating a forward pan that still looked beautifully cinematic.
- Sora delivered a soft, slow pan-out; Higgsfield a gentle vertical lift.
Creative Note: This shot revealed how cinematic pacing, not just movement, drives emotion—a human director’s intuition that AI is still learning to replicate.
What We Learned
- Tracking shots are currently AI’s strongest area for believable motion.
- Crane and pullback shots show potential for cinematic scale and emotional tone.
- Orbit shots remain the biggest challenge—consistent 3D mapping and subject tracking need major refinement.
These experiments confirmed something we’ve seen throughout this series: AI’s realism improves dramatically when guided with the precision of a creative expert.The best results came from prompts written like a cinematographer’s notes—defining not just what the camera sees, but how it moves.
Conclusion
At Futureproof Studios, we’re exploring how creativity and technology evolve—one experiment at a time.
This test reinforced something easy to overlook: camera movement is storytelling. It’s not just about adding motion, it’s about shaping how a story unfolds on screen.
AI tools are getting better at generating scenes. But when it comes to cinematic movement, results still hinge on the direction behind the prompt. The best outcomes came when we approached the prompt like a filmmaker would: thinking in shots, lenses, pacing, and purpose.
We’ll keep exploring what’s possible, and where the gaps still are. Because as the tools improve, it’s not just prompting that matters, it’s the creative instincts behind it.
I never got to meet Bill Bernbach, but the man had one hell of an impact on me. My first job in advertising was when I was recruited from an agency that mostly built websites to start the San Francisco office of Tribal DDB. They handed us a book of Bill Bernbach quotes on our first day.
In our last post, we explored how cybersecurity brands can stand out amid a sea of sameness. Today, I want to push deeper—into a distinction I hear too rarely: branding vs. brand-building. And I’ll walk you through a real example: how we brought the power of both to life for Recorded Future’s biggest Predict conference yet.
At an exclusive Futureproof dinner during Advertising Week NYC, leaders gathered to discuss how AI is reshaping marketing. No panels. No fluff. Just raw, honest conversation about brand, bias, creativity—and what it means to lead in a world moving faster than ever.